// sample report

A typical Friday-afternoon environment.

One resource group, eight resources, zero zone redundancy. Sound familiar?

COMPOSITE SLA · YOUR ENVIRONMENT
99.631%
≈ 32.4 h/yr downtime budget · 2.4 nines · 6 resources in 1 group(s), worst-case serial
99999.999.9999.999
README BADGE OnlyNines99.63%run your own assessment to save & get a live badge

How critical is this workload?

WAF: define reliability targets ↗
TARGET UNREACHABLE WITH TIER UPGRADES. Even maxing every ladder gets you to 99.775%. This target needs architecture, not tiers: redundant sets across zones, multi-region. WAF: redundancy ↗
Worth doing (in this order):
st-assets-lrs lrs → geo-redundant −7.9 h/yr
redis-session-c1 standard → zone-redundant −4.4 h/yr
sql-orders-prod standard → zone-redundant −0.4 h/yr

Weakest links

top 5 across the environment · h/yr
#Resource · current tierCostsNext rung
1
vm-web-01Azure Virtual Machines · single-premium-disk · rg-shop-prod
8.8 h/yr
2
st-assets-lrsAzure Storage Account · lrs · rg-shop-prod
8.8 h/yr geo-redundant −7.9 h/yr
3
redis-session-c1Azure Cache for Redis · standard · rg-shop-prod
8.8 h/yr zone-redundant −4.4 h/yr
4
appgw-edge-01Azure Application Gateway (v2) · v2 · rg-shop-prod
4.4 h/yr
5
sql-orders-prodAzure SQL Database · standard · rg-shop-prod
0.9 h/yr zone-redundant −0.4 h/yr
● Unknown bucket

1 resource(s) have no published Microsoft SLA in our dataset, so we excluded them from the composite rather than guess. They're not hidden — they're just not counted.

eventgrid-topic-orders
Not counted (by design):func-webhooks-consumption
Designed availability, not a guarantee.